Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THREAT OF NAZI “PUTSCH”

GRAVE ASPECTS OF SAAR POLL

FRENCH THREATEN USE OF TROOPS United Press Association—By Electric Telegraph—Copyright (Received November 1, 10 p.m.) LONDON, November 1. Significance it attached to the interview between M. Corbin (French Ambassador) and Sir John Simon (Secretary for Foreign Affairs) when the Ambassador indicated the French view of the steps required to ensure the smooth conduct of the Saar plebiscite. These plans are being considered in dettil by the Council of the League of Nations on November 19.

The diplomatic correspondent of “The Daily Telegraph” understands that M. Corbin reasserted France’s determination to carry out her international obligations, in the event of trouble developing in the Saar. The correspor dent was assured that the reports, which were more specific as regards the steps France will take in preparation for this eventuality, are without foundation.

The Berlin Press is filled with protests against the reported preparations that Prance will concentrate troops near the frontier for intervention in the Saar in case of a Nazi “putsch.” A semi-official source states that Germany has every interest in seeing that the plebiscite is carried out under perfect discipline.

“The Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung” suggests that the entry of French troops into the Saar might mean war. The Paris correspondent of “The Times” says: “Though it is realised that France has special responsibilities in the Saar, it is also felt that the intervention of France alone, however justified, would lead to disastrous consequences. British troops, even the barest handful, should accompany them. The British objections to such a commitment is fully realised, but it is urged that, apart altogether from the general question of diverting a possible casus belli, the juridical responsibilities of Britain are as great as France’s, and such a flagrant violation of treaties as a “putsch” could not pass unchecked.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THD19341102.2.78

Bibliographic details

Timaru Herald, Volume CXXXVIII, Issue 19946, 2 November 1934, Page 9

Word Count
303

THREAT OF NAZI “PUTSCH” Timaru Herald, Volume CXXXVIII, Issue 19946, 2 November 1934, Page 9

THREAT OF NAZI “PUTSCH” Timaru Herald, Volume CXXXVIII, Issue 19946, 2 November 1934, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert