Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ANZAC DAY BREACHES

PENALTIES IMPOSED IN TEMUKA CASES. At the May sitting of the Magistrate’s Court in Temuka the Magistrate, Mr C. R. Orr-Walker, S.M., reserved judgment in the case in which the licensee of the Empire Hotel, Temuka, was charged with selling liquor on April 25, Anzac Day. Decision was reserved in order that consideration be given to the point raised by the licensee’s solicitor (Mr W. D. Campbell) as to whether or not Anzac Day and Sunday were required to be observed along similar lines in respect of hotel business. The Magistrate gave judgment in Timaru, in which he held that Anzac Day was required to be observed in all respects as a Sunday. At yesterday’s sitting of the Magistrate’s Court in Temuka, charges of being found unlawfully on the premises of the Empire Hotel on April 25 were preferred against George Watt, James Cecil Moore, Samuel Smith, Thomas Brophy, Thomas Waaka. Leslie Benbow and Michael McGillen. Smith, who had not previously appeared, appeared and pleaded guilty. To the Magistrate, defendant said that he was not a returned soldier. The Magistrate: “Not an Anzac." Arising from the above Matthew Michael Coffey was charged that, on Anril 25. being the licensee of the Empire Hotel he did sell liquor when the premises were required to be closed. The Magistrate said that he had already given a written decision in Timaru to the effect that Anzac Day to all intents and purposes, was required to be observed as a Sunday. With regard to the men found on. the premises, they would be fined £2 and costs each. The licensee’s action in dispensing liquor on Anzac Day was a serious ' Had it not been for several mitisrat ! pg circumstances he would have imposed the maximum fine of £lO. were some Anzacs in the defendants. and they had pleaded with the barman, and later with the licensee, to supply drink. The licensee would be fined £5.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THD19330614.2.43

Bibliographic details

Timaru Herald, Volume CXXXVII, Issue 19515, 14 June 1933, Page 5

Word Count
324

ANZAC DAY BREACHES Timaru Herald, Volume CXXXVII, Issue 19515, 14 June 1933, Page 5

ANZAC DAY BREACHES Timaru Herald, Volume CXXXVII, Issue 19515, 14 June 1933, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert