DIVORCE COURT.
Per Prm Auooktion. DUNEDIN, November 8. A decree nisi was granted this morning in the Oamaru case, Margaret Cook v. Samuel Thomas Cook, on the ground of desertion. , ( A , In the Divorce Court to-day the case of Muirhead v. Muirhead and Gaw, husband's petition, was concluded. Petitioner alleged that respondent had misconducted herself with co-respondent at Pelicheb Bay Station of which co-respon-dent was the stationmaster, the petitioner; discovering them by looking through the windows of the station. The jury, after a long retirement returned when the foreman reported that on the first toro*— "W*P respondent guilty of adultery with.eo-J*r spondent?" Nine said no, and three yes. On the issue—" Did the co-respondent commit adulter? with respondent?" one said yes saa eleveri *aH OT. The petition WW dismissed, the Gbkrf »&*• "2& if far « a» flirt tonw ** 1 S B ?? , SS: It was stated that a Wo£**«jJ*«*«jj for« s*v trial* Decrees nisi were jpaiirW W tM»»« Grev v. GreyrwifeTpetition, and Crook v wffe's petition, on the ground of desertion.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THD19061109.2.40
Bibliographic details
Timaru Herald, Volume LXXXIX, Issue 13128, 9 November 1906, Page 5
Word Count
169DIVORCE COURT. Timaru Herald, Volume LXXXIX, Issue 13128, 9 November 1906, Page 5
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Timaru Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in