THE MONS RETREAT.
CONFLICTING STATEMENTS. ‘ By Telegraph—Press Assn.—Copyright. LONDON, June 10. Mr. Asquith, denying responsibility for the shell shortage, levelled a grave accusation against Lord French’s handling of the mens re treat. -Mr. Asquith stated that the message from General French idled the Cabinet with consternation. The British 'commander’s contemplated movements would have had the effect of leaving the Allies in the In'eh at* a‘moment of the most extreme need. The Times carefully examines the known facts about the retreat, and declares that Mr. Asquith’s allegations are untrue. Lord Trench knew that the heavy losses of gums, machine-guns and equipment forbade the British Army from taking the offensive. The position grew worse, and his judgment was conhrmed by the sudden withdrawal of the French army on his right. TliSii General Smith-Dorricn lost 14,000 men at Lo Gateau in an action taken despite Lord French and contrary to orders. General Joffrc was clearly and repeatedly informed that the British, while keeping their line, should he retired pending refitting and reinforcement. Cabinet then sent Lord Kitchener to override Lord French, but the latter persisted with Ids plan, which triumphed at the Marne. Lord Kitchener was not allowed to move the men or guns.—United Service.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TH19190618.2.45
Bibliographic details
Taranaki Herald, Volume LXVII, Issue 16465, 18 June 1919, Page 4
Word Count
202THE MONS RETREAT. Taranaki Herald, Volume LXVII, Issue 16465, 18 June 1919, Page 4
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.