Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

APPEAL COURT.

THE MARCONI CASE. Per Press Association. WELLINGTON. May 3. Judgment was delivered in the case Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company v. the King (sent April 23)., The majority of the court (Justices Williams, Denniston, Edwards, and Chapman, Sir Robert Stout dissenting) held (1) that the petition disclosed a cause of action in respect to present user only, not in respect to threatened use under contract ; (2) that the court on a petition of right had a right to try the validity of a patent, also the question of user; (3) the court could not give the relief claimed, but could make a declaratory decree as to user and the right to have compensation assessed under section 31 (2) of the New Zealand Patents, Designs and Trade Marks Act, 1908. Each party is to pay its own costs.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TH19120503.2.71

Bibliographic details

Taranaki Herald, Volume LX, Issue 143781, 3 May 1912, Page 7

Word Count
138

APPEAL COURT. Taranaki Herald, Volume LX, Issue 143781, 3 May 1912, Page 7

APPEAL COURT. Taranaki Herald, Volume LX, Issue 143781, 3 May 1912, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert