INGLEWOOD NEWS.

Taranaki Herald, Volume LIII, Issue 12862, 22 May 1905, Page 5

INGLEWOOD NEWS.

(from Our Own Correspondent.)

S.#. COUET.

(Before Mr A. Turnbull, S.M.)

CIVIL.

G. Gudgeon v. A. Orr. Claim XI 10s, and costs 12s. Judgment by consent. Mr Crombie for plaintiff.

J\loa Farmers' Union v. J. Love. Claim £S 11s, for goods supplied to one J. Taylor at the reqluest of defendant. Plaintiffs were non-suited, with solicitor's costs 21s. 3lr Sponce for plaintiff and Mr C. H. Weston for defendant.

CRIiMIiN'AL.

Police y. T. Marsack. Defendant was charged with procuring liquor while l hKmig a prohibited person. He pleaded not guilty, and was defended by iMV Spence. After hearing evidence, he was convicted and fined £3, and costs 9s, in default one month in New Plymouth gaol; fine to bo paid forthwith.

Police v. R. Johnson. Defendant was charged with supplying liquor to a prohibited person, knowing him to be prohibited. Ele pleaded not guilty, and was defended by Mr Sponce. Fined £3, costs 9s; in default one month in New Plymouth gaol; fine to bo paid forthwith.

Police v. B. 3lcManus. Defendant was charged with procuring liquor while prohibited. Ho pleaded not guilty and was defended by flMr Thomson. Fined £2. and costs 9s; in default 14 days' in New Plymouth gaol; allowed seven days to pay line.

Police v. J. Bunyan. Defendant was charg-cd with supplying liquor to a prohibited person, knowing the perso^i to b^ prohibited. JTe pleaded not guilty, and was defended l^y Mr Thomson. Fined £3, and costs 7s, in defauH ono month in New Plymouth q-aol. Seven days wore allowed to pay the fine-