Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WANGANUI HARBOUR

INCREASE IN RATE. “CUT-THROAT” POLICY. Wanganui, May 21. The estimates adopted by the Wanganui ' Harbour Board to-day provided for a slight increase in the rates levied on contributing local bodies. Commenting thereon, Mr. J. T. Hogan, a member of the board, said that through no fault of its own, but' due to the “cutthroat policy of two Government Departments”—the Dairy Board and the Railways—the port of Wanganui had to appeal to its ratepayers to foot the bill. “The position is scandalous,” he said. The chairman, Mr. William Morrison: What would you suggest? Mr. Hogan: I suggest that we do not strike a higher rate than we struck last year, and that we appeal to the Government for assistance. Mr. Morrison. What if we don’t get what we appeal for? Mr. Hogan: Our appeal is in Wellington to the Government, and if it is not met let the Government run the port It thinks it can run the railways; let it run the port as well, instead of competing with it and asking the ratepayers to pay. “We have got to run our own show," said Mr. W. S. Glenn. “There is too much of this appealing to the Government; too much spoon feeding. Neither the Harbour Board nor the people of Wanganui want that.” Mr. Hogan: But they want fair play at the hands of Government departments. Mr. Glenn: We don’t want Government interference —I agree with you there, but we must run our own concern. Mr. Hogan held that as the Unemployment Board received £4,000,000 a year, the rates of local bodies should have been reduced considerably. Mr. Morrison stated that local bodies on this coast had already reduced their rates. Mr. Hogan replied that such was so, but in the Harbour Board’s case the Government was competing by cutting freights to Wanganui and adopting truck rates to Palmerston North. The Dairy Board was restricting factories from using their most economical port. If it were not for that competition' the harbour rates would have been reduced long ago. Mr. Morrison: I agree with you there,

The estimates were adopted, two members dissenting, Messrs. Hogan and R. Farley.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19340523.2.114.4

Bibliographic details

Taranaki Daily News, 23 May 1934, Page 8

Word Count
360

WANGANUI HARBOUR Taranaki Daily News, 23 May 1934, Page 8

WANGANUI HARBOUR Taranaki Daily News, 23 May 1934, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert