Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RASPUTIN FILM

SHOWING MODIFIED'VERSION. QUESTION BEFORE COURT. '. . ■ London, March 12. The question, of how far modified the Rasputin film must be before it could again be shown without infringing the injunction order arose in the Appeal Court. Sir William Jowitt, counsel for Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, assured the Court that

everything objectionable had been deleted from the film, and a stay of execution was granted, conditional on damages being paid . into Court, of which £5OOO should be paid to Princess . Yousoupoff, who was recently awarded £25,000 for libel. The Court left counsel to agree to the form of the injunction.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19340402.2.187

Bibliographic details

Taranaki Daily News, 2 April 1934, Page 14

Word Count
97

RASPUTIN FILM Taranaki Daily News, 2 April 1934, Page 14

RASPUTIN FILM Taranaki Daily News, 2 April 1934, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert