SUPREME COURT.

Taranaki Daily News, 14 September 1920, Page 7

SUPREME COURT.

ADJOURNED SITTING. TO BE RESUMED TO-MORROW. The sitting of tho Supreme Court at New Plymouth, which had to be adjourned on August 21 in order to allow Sir John Salmond to fulfil his engagement at the Wanganui Supreme Court, will be resumed to-morrow .morning at 10 o'clock. Sir John Salmond will preside. Owing to illness lie was not able to leave Wellington in time to reach here and resume the sitting to-day, as previously arranged. Telegraphic advice to this effect was received by the Registrar yesterday. The list of cases to be heard includes the following:— James R. Corrigan v. Noti Wairahui, amount agreed on £250. James John Patterson v. Morrisey and Company, return of car or £3ll and damages £SO. Charles Thomas Ruudle v. Te Hokio Ngahuinga and Panenui, claim for £275 and interest £77 13s. a'nd costs £ls 15s. Charles Alfred Percy Wood v. Mary Ann Bailey, claim for performance of contract possession of property and damages £IOO. James Dayid Ross v. Warea Cooperative Dairy Factory Company, Ltd., claim for £3OO damages for wrongful dismissal. George Bartholomew Purdue v. Etta Cornea Branley and 'others, claim for performance of agreement or £IOO damages for breach of contract. John Penwarden v. Charles A. P. Wood and P. A. Badland, possession of land and forfeiture of lease,' rent and £IOO compensation for breach of contract. Jessie A. Bartlett v. T. F. and J. H. Graham, performance of agreement, £IOO damages for non-performance, £5600 damages if agreement cannot be performed.—Counter-claim, recission of agreement, refund of £2OO with interest and £ISOO damages if court holds agreement be performed. F. and F. W. Shackleton v. C. L. Wilson, special damages £1289 and £275 general damages and taking of account . Xhe Bonitbon JP««»iuiM J?fttrol«um-

Company v. P. Hadley, claim for £I2OO damages for wrongful conversion. Charles Stone v. F. A. Lichtwask, claim for £655 for breach of contract. ORIGINATING SUMMONS. Edwin Dixon and Herbert Halliwell v. Frederick Martin, summons for interpretation of will. APPEALS. Alexander C. M'Donnell (appellant) v. Hugh D. Armour (respondent), under Licensing Act, appeal from determination of Wyvern Wilson, Esq., S.M., at Patea. Werio Kingi (appellant) v. W. Arthur Guy (respondent), under Magistrate's Court Act, appeal from the decision of T. A. B. Bailey, Es,q., S.M., at Hawera, on law and fact.