S.M. COURT.
Monday, June 4.—Before Mr. R, L. Stanford, S.M. Judgment went for plaintiff by default in the case of W. Falkner v. E. W. Hay; amount £l2 15s Id, costs 41 10s 6d. Mr. Wilson for plaintiff, DEFENDED CASE. Newton King v. E, W, Hay.—This was a claim to recover the balance dun op a boat supplied by phintiff to defendant, Mr. Weston appeared for plaintiff. Mr. Shaw stated tbat be had sold a boat at Waitara for Mr. N. King to tb© defendant, who had paid him ill deposit on the same, No further payments had been made since. The defence was that no gear had been supplied with the boat, and, farther, tbat defendant did not consider the boat worth the money. His Worship said that he could not consider defendant's plea, as the gear had clearly been supplied with the boat and the price arranged for. Judgment would be for plaintiff for the balance £5 6s, with costs,
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19000605.2.8
Bibliographic details
Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXXXII, Issue 100, 5 June 1900, Page 2
Word Count
162S.M. COURT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXXXII, Issue 100, 5 June 1900, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in