Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CIVIL JURISDICTION.

DIVORCE CASE

John Sidney Winstanley, of Nelson, petitioned for a divorce from his wife, Annie Eliza Winstanley, of Welimgton, on the ground of desertion. Respondent counter-petitiontd for a divorce on. the same ground. Mr C.•■■lt. Fell appeared for the petitioner, and Mr T. _M. Wilofrd for the respondent. . ■-' .."'

■ Mr Wilford sa id that the petitioner had -abandoned" his suit on the ground that it could nob he supported, and he proposed to proceed with the counterclaim.

■ In evidence Annie Eliza Win Stanley i stated- that she was married, at ' Wellington in 1887, and there were six children,-two of whom were.under.the age of 16 years.- She lived in Nelson with her husband until October, 191.L, and en October 27th of that year left for Wellington. Six months prior to that date he left her. As they could not live happily together, they decided to separate. Until she left for Wellington he contributed something towards, her support. While she had been in Wellington she had supported herself by keeping boarders 'without any assistance from him. Eighteen months afterwards he asked her to come back to him, and .she came to Nelson, but no rccoucijiation took place. Charles Henry Winstanley, eon. of the respondent, also gave evidence. A decree nisi was granted, to be made absolute after three months. His Honour made an interim order for ttie custody of tho two youngest, children, and the- payment of 35s per week alimony until tho decree is made absolute.

Mr Wilford intimated that tho petitioner had paid all costs, including-the costs as between solicitor and client, and, therefore;, no order was asked for.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TC19170321.2.58.8

Bibliographic details

Colonist, Volume LVIII, Issue 14368, 21 March 1917, Page 11 (Supplement)

Word Count
270

CIVIL JURISDICTION. Colonist, Volume LVIII, Issue 14368, 21 March 1917, Page 11 (Supplement)

CIVIL JURISDICTION. Colonist, Volume LVIII, Issue 14368, 21 March 1917, Page 11 (Supplement)

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert