Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE NAVIGATION BILL.

London, February 4. The Council of the Mercantile Marine Service Association complain j that the Australian Navigation Bill occasionally but unwarrantably interferes with the prerogatives of the British Board of Trade. The, Council protests against section 369 of the Bill, and desires a revision of the parts relating to Courts of Marine Inquiry. The clause provides that i f a certificate had been cancelled by an Australian Court of Mariuo Inquiry the fact that the certificate had been returned to the officer by the Board of Trade, the authority which originally granted it, oth r than the Court of Appeal shall not enable the said master or officer to serve on. the ship in Australia in tbc capacity specified in the cancelled certificate.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TC19080206.2.20.1.2

Bibliographic details

Colonist, Volume L, Issue 12159, 6 February 1908, Page 4

Word Count
126

THE NAVIGATION BILL. Colonist, Volume L, Issue 12159, 6 February 1908, Page 4

THE NAVIGATION BILL. Colonist, Volume L, Issue 12159, 6 February 1908, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert