Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BIBLE IN SCHOOLS.

To tlie Editor of THE SUN. Sir, —The tone "of Mr Ramsay 's letterstamps him as one of those oddities who have a down on the clergy, and imagine that their: ill-will is widoiy shared, because the crowds outside Church on Sundays are larger than, those inside. These crowds of holidaymakers prefer amusement to but cannot effeet both at once. . Thoy are not spiteful and unjust. Why should they hate the clergy? The modern clergyman works hard on poor pay' for the welfare of his fellow-meii. The frequent charge that, the Schools League obtains signatures undeifalse pretences implies that the recipients of free compulsory secular education cannot read. For printed plainly " on each of our cards is the following':- '' I am in favour of the system ,of religious instruction in State schools, described on the other side, and reqnest referendum to be taken thereon." " "Objective." (on back of card):— System of religious instruction in State schools prevailing in Australia. - Eesr sons read in school hours by the children themselves from Scripture booksprovided by the Education Department,- ' State school teachers supervising the reading, but not giving 'sectarian or dogmatic teaching. Visits during school hours by ministers or teachers from the churches, instructing . children in the faith of their fathers. Conscience clause, by which the parent has complete control of the child's religious instruction in the; publie school.' f . It is nowhere stated that the claim, for exemption must be in writing. But if it were, where is the hardship? Have the recipients of free compulsory secular education a, ; difficulty in writing as well as r in reading? • How is persecution possible if a conscience clause affords exemption?. How can water be held in a sieve?' All such arguments are unmitigated '' bounce,<: : and imply that the recipients of free compulsory secular education cannot think, read, or write.—l am, etc., ; ; . PARENTS' EIGHT.. - ,>

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNCH19140408.2.47.1

Bibliographic details

Sun (Christchurch), Volume I, Issue 53, 8 April 1914, Page 6

Word Count
312

BIBLE IN SCHOOLS. Sun (Christchurch), Volume I, Issue 53, 8 April 1914, Page 6

BIBLE IN SCHOOLS. Sun (Christchurch), Volume I, Issue 53, 8 April 1914, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert