Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

POWER POLE CASE

LIABILITY FOR REMOVALS The question of liability in the removal of power poles is expected to be settled in a Supreme Court case in Invercargill shortly. Mr. A. Alain, secretary-treasurer to the Waitemata Electric-Power Board informed the board this morning that the action was understood to be in view. The Southland Electric-Power Board apparently was seeking to have the liability defined in a question similar to the difference between the Power Board and the Waitemata County Council over the cost of removing poles, in county work, in the Titirangi main highway. A letter from the Hawke’s Bay Electric-Power Board said that were CQunties responsible for the cost of alterations, requests for removals would be less frequent.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19300203.2.173

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 887, 3 February 1930, Page 16

Word Count
119

POWER POLE CASE Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 887, 3 February 1930, Page 16

POWER POLE CASE Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 887, 3 February 1930, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert