Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

JUNIOR FOOTBALL

Centra! Division WITHDRAWAL OF ELTHAM Fixtures Redrawn The Elthain first junior Rugby team, which forfeited to Pukcnguhu iii the opening sel of fixtures in flio Central Division junior Rugby competition, has withdrawn from the competition, as it is unable to raise sufficient players. Pukengahu, the team to which Eltham forfeited, therefore loses the two points gained thereby ami the fixtures have to be redrawn. Eight, teams remain in the grade, and while Eltham's defection lakes a certain amount of interest from Ihe competition there will still lie Four matches every Thursday, and if the form shown by the teams so far is any criterion the! games will hold much interest in view of the even matching of the competitors. On account of Eltham's withdrawal from, the junior Rugby competition, the Central executive has announced the following re-draw: April 27. —Tariki v. Midhirsf, at Midhirst; Celtic, v. Toko, at; Stratford; Cardiff v. Stratford, at Cardiff. May ■!, —Pukengahu v. Tariki, at. Tariki; Stratford v. Midhirst, at Midhirst; Celtic v. Cardiff, at Strat ford; Toko v. Inglewood, at Toko. May 11. —Pukengahu v. Midhirst, at Pukengahu; Celtic v. Tariki, at Tariki; Toko v. Cardiff, at, Toko; Inglewood v. Stratford, at Stratford. :\l ;iy is.— Pukengahu v. Celtic, at Pukengahu; Stratford v. Toko, at Stratford; Tariki v. Cardiff, at Cardiff; Midhirst v. Inglewood, at Inglewood. May 25.- Tariki v. Toko, at Tariki; Pukengahu v. Strafford, at Pukengahu; Celtic v. Midhirst, at Strafford; Cardiff v. Inglewood, at Inglewood. June I.—Cardiff v. Midhirst, at. Midhirst: Celtic v. Inglewood, at Inglewood; Stratford v. Tariki, at Stratford; Pukengahu v. Toko, at Toko. June B.—Stratford v. Celtic, at Stratford; Toko v. Midhirst, at Toko; Inglewood v. Tariki, at Tariki; Cardiff v. Pukengahu, at Cardiff. To lie played on date to be arrangnd. —Pukengahu v. Inglewood, at Tnglewood.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19330506.2.62

Bibliographic details

Stratford Evening Post, Volume II, Issue 236, 6 May 1933, Page 7

Word Count
300

JUNIOR FOOTBALL Stratford Evening Post, Volume II, Issue 236, 6 May 1933, Page 7

JUNIOR FOOTBALL Stratford Evening Post, Volume II, Issue 236, 6 May 1933, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert