Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MUNN APPEAL DISMISSED

COURT A OMITS EVIDENCE.

Press Association—Copyright. WELLINGTON, This Day. Whr'ii the-Conn of Appeul sat this morning the Chief Justice stated that the Court did not desire to hear Mr Northcroft on the second point of appeal, name. ly, the question of the admissability of Mrs Brown's evidence, Thet Court «ras unanimously of opinion, that the evidence of the children was admissible, but as the matter was of importance it Avould put its reasons into writing: at a later date.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19300625.2.33

Bibliographic details

Stratford Evening Post, Issue 84, 25 June 1930, Page 5

Word Count
82

MUNN APPEAL DISMISSED Stratford Evening Post, Issue 84, 25 June 1930, Page 5

MUNN APPEAL DISMISSED Stratford Evening Post, Issue 84, 25 June 1930, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert