Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LECALITY OF LOOSE HEAD QUESTIONED.

United* Brps s fAasn.— By Electric Telegraph Copyright. (Received 10.20 n.m.) PORT ELIZABETH, Ang. 13. The manager of the Springbok team' iihs raised a doubt about the legality of the New Zealand loose head,forward in the scrum, lie has decided to place the rufes More the South African / Rughy Board and to ask for a, ' ruling. The New Zealanders are confident that no objection can be made to playing a loose head in the front row as was done In the second test. They propose to pack the same scrnni again. It worked effectively at Johannesburg, but they are expecting sort of counter move from the Springboks* Mr V. S. Neste 1 , wlio refereed the two first tests, has been chosen for the third.—Special to Press Assn. V

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19280814.2.22

Bibliographic details

Stratford Evening Post, Issue 16, 14 August 1928, Page 5

Word Count
133

LECALITY OF LOOSE HEAD QUESTIONED. Stratford Evening Post, Issue 16, 14 August 1928, Page 5

LECALITY OF LOOSE HEAD QUESTIONED. Stratford Evening Post, Issue 16, 14 August 1928, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert