Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

APPEAL COURT.

SEQUEL TO AUCKLAND WHARF THEFTS. (Per Press Association.) Auckland, October IG. In the Appeal Court to-day, Mr. Cotter, on behalf of the Auckland Law Society, moved to have a rule nisi to strike John Raphael' London, of Auckland, off the roll of barristers and solicitors for professional misconduct, made absolute. Mr. Morrison appeared for London. Mr. Cotter stated that when Haddou was arrested for wharf thefts, Mr. Shelton was instructed to act for him, but notwithstanding that Lundon, without communicating with Mr. Shelton, obtained an interview with Haddon, and secured an order from him to lift money in custody of the police. Ho obtained £3 IBs 7d. The next morning Haddon was asked in the presence of both who was acting for Him, and he replied that Mr. Shelton was, but Lundon said nothing about the money. After that London had a further interview with Haddon, and a letter was written partly at his dictation cancelling Mr. Shelton’s retainer, and appointing Lundon. Mr. Shelton was not to be informed of this till after be had made application for bail, and Lundon ,was tlion to take over the case.- Mi*. Shelton did make application to Haddon’s surprise, Lundon having told him ho had thrown np the case. It then came out that had obtained the money, and Mr. Shelton demanded .it from him. No reply being given, a summons was is' sued. Messrs. Sheahan and Flynn, acting for London, got the summons withdrawn, and Mr. Flynn paid the money, including costs. Lundon bed not refunded it, because bo objected to the costs. Mr. Cotter read affidavits in support of bis case.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19111016.2.46.12

Bibliographic details

Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXI, Issue 52, 16 October 1911, Page 6

Word Count
272

APPEAL COURT. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXI, Issue 52, 16 October 1911, Page 6

APPEAL COURT. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXI, Issue 52, 16 October 1911, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert