Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

EMPLOYERS AND COMPENSATION

REPLY TO MINISTER’S STATEMENT (United Press Association) WELLINGTON, August 13. ' The statement made by the Minister of Labour (the Hon. H. T. Armstrong) when referring to the Workers Compensation Act is commented upon by the New Zealand Employers’ Federation. Mr Armstrong said that cases had been reported to him where employers had defied the law and had stopped the payment of compensation contrary to the letter of the amendment of the Workers Compensation Act 1937. “There is something to be said on the other side, particularly in cases where there is permanent partial disablement,” states the federation. “Such cases at some time invariably reach the point where a lump sum settlement is readily accessible and no particular difficulty arises, because in the event of agreement between the parties not being possible the matter can quickly be decided by the Court, but in many recent cases the Court of Arbitration has not been in that particular place for 12 months and cases which have reached the stage when a lump sum settlement of employers’ liability should be made have proved exceedingly difficult to settle. The injured worker has refused to accept all offers of a reasonable sum calculated in accordance with the general practice and the recorded decisions of the Court of Arbitration, and so the employer has been forced to continue paying out weekly compensation for a long period, and at the end of such a period has had to pay as well a lump sum which should have been decided at the time when the case first became ripe for such settlement. “No one would quarrel with Mr Armstrong’s avowed intention to impose a penalty where the employer improperly stops the payment of compensation, but on the other hand some provision is necessary to enable the settlement of a case to be made when it is ripe for settlement and the employer should not be called upon to go on paying weekly compensation for indefinite periods in such cases.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19380815.2.111

Bibliographic details

Southland Times, Issue 23587, 15 August 1938, Page 11

Word Count
333

EMPLOYERS AND COMPENSATION Southland Times, Issue 23587, 15 August 1938, Page 11

EMPLOYERS AND COMPENSATION Southland Times, Issue 23587, 15 August 1938, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert