NEUTRALITY LAW

Southland Times, Issue 22733, 8 November 1935, Page 7

NEUTRALITY LAW

UNITED STATES

MEASURE MAY BE AMENDED

GOVERNMENT’S ATTI-

TUDE

(United Press Assn.—Telegraph Copyright.) (Rec. 8.55 p.m.) Washington, November 6. What is interpreted as the Administration’s dissatisfaction with the neutrality law and a possible desire to cooperate with the League in stopping the war between Italy and Ethiopia was voiced to-night in an address drafted by Mr Cordell Hull, Secretary of State, in his absence delivered over the radio by the Acting-Secretary, Mr Phillips. The address was apparently designed to arouse public opinion to the necessities of the situation in anticipation of the next session of Congress which will undoubtedly be requested by Mr Roosevelt. to draft a new law replacing the mandatory munitions embargo with broad permissive powers. In arguing for such a change Mr Hull said: “Our foreign policy would indeed be weak if it began and ended with the announcement of a neutrality position on the outbreak of a foreign war. I do conceive that it is our duty, and in the interests of our country and humanity, not only to remain aloof from disputes and conflicts with which we have not direct concern, but also to use our influence in any appropriate way to bring a peaceful settlement of international differences.”

While repeatedly qualifying any suggestion of international co-operation, he said: “A virile policy tempered with prudent caution is necessary if we are to retain the respect of other nations and at the same time hold our position of influence for peace and international stability in the family of nations.”

Mr Hull’s words seemed to be in close accord with those who hold that the United States, if it is unable to directly co-operate with the League of Nations in its efforts to halt the African war, at least should take steps to ensure its non-interference with League actions.