Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CLAIM DISMISSED

COURT OF APPEAL CASE. SOLICITOR’S CHARGE RULED OUT. (Per United Press Association.) Wellington, October 10. The Court of Appeal has delivered judgment in the case of Boddie v. Armstrong and Springhall, Ltd., heard before the Court on September 21. The Court upheld the decision of the Magistrate, Mr F. Stillwell, and dismissed the appeal. The Court held that Rule 43 of the Court of Appeal rules debarred a solicitor from making any profit charge against a client appealing as a pauper, either for work done in the Court of Appeal or in the Supreme Court. Consequently Boddie’s solicitors could not claim lien upon the amount of judgment obtained against Sievwright, and the respondents were entitled to their attachment order.

Costs amounting to £7 7/- were allowed against the appellant.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19341011.2.41

Bibliographic details

Southland Times, Issue 22448, 11 October 1934, Page 6

Word Count
131

CLAIM DISMISSED Southland Times, Issue 22448, 11 October 1934, Page 6

CLAIM DISMISSED Southland Times, Issue 22448, 11 October 1934, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert