Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WATERSIDEES’ DISPUTE

BITTER EXCHANGES IN COURT. (Per United Press Association) WELLINGTON, March 29. During the hearing of the waterside case in the Arbitration Court Mr Bruce, for the Union, asked Captain Walton, wharf superintendent for the Union Co : You have said I threatened to stick up a ship if you did not agree to our terms. When was that. Witness : You have said that so many times. Mr Bruce : Have you not told me you would stick the whole lot up ? Witness : Yes, I told you if you went on like you were doing the employers were prepared to stick up the whole lot. Pressed as to instances witness mentioned the Kaituna Calm and Kaitangata. The exchange between the parties at this stage became so acrimonious that the president of the Court intervened. Later a remark by Mr Smith that Union officials thought it too risky to go into the box brought Mr Roberts to his feet in vehement protest. He was not afraid to go into the box anywhere. He complained that the employers * representatives were trying to force the inference that Union officials were a section of desperadoes. The president of the Court remarked that he would have stopped Mr Smith if he thought the statement was meant lyThe taking of evidence was then continued. VARIOUS IRREGULARITIES CITED. WELLINGTON, March 29. Other evidence before the Arbitration Court to-day in connection with the waterside labour case was that travelling time between the suburbs and the wharves was not fairly used. The present system of labour caused a good deal of over-lapping. Stop-work meetings should be held one month in day time and the next at night in order to give the employer a fair thing. As to the wet weather clause it was stated that the men knocked off on the slightest excuse as regards unfavourable weather. Regarding the supervision of men a good deal depended on how watersiders were handled. If handled well they would work well. As to personal supervision Mr Roberts for the Federation maintained that where they got personal supervision no dif Acuities arose. The sitting adjourned till to-morrow.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19220330.2.53

Bibliographic details

Southland Times, Issue 19478, 30 March 1922, Page 5

Word Count
354

WATERSIDEES’ DISPUTE Southland Times, Issue 19478, 30 March 1922, Page 5

WATERSIDEES’ DISPUTE Southland Times, Issue 19478, 30 March 1922, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert