THE DREYFUS CASE.
United Press Association—By Electric Telegraph—Copyright. Received August 21st, 9 5 a.m. Paris, August 20, M. Labori expects to be able to resume the defence of Dreyfus to-morrow. Mr Bterrell, an English barrister visiting Rennes, describes the unreality of the trial. He believes that M. Jouast favours an acquittal. He says the instructions from superiors are likely to outweigh the prejudices of the Courtmartial. Received August 21st, 11 a.m. M, Gonse admitted that while examining the bordereau, he noticed a similarity between the handwriting of Esterhazy and Dreyfus. He instructed M. Pjcquart to separate the documents bearing the two handwritings, at both the first Court-martial and Court of Cassation inquiry.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SCANT18990821.2.23
Bibliographic details
South Canterbury Times, Issue 2569, 21 August 1899, Page 3
Word Count
112THE DREYFUS CASE. South Canterbury Times, Issue 2569, 21 August 1899, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in