Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AN AMUS ING INCIDENT.

MARTON COURT. Recollections of comic opera were revived by a little unexpected drama that enlivened yesterday’s™prooeedings at the Marten Magistrate’s Court. Thera was being heard a charge of cruelty to a horse. Constable Fitzpatrick: was crossexamining the defendant and was plying him closely with questions as to the method in which he had administered to the horse the chastisement which was the of the charge. It had been deposed by the witnesses that the defendant had caught hold of the horse by its ear and dealt it several blows with his fist. The defendant alleged that he had not used his fist, but had used his open hand. Constable Fita» patriok was dissecting every detail and the defendant (who had in his evidence displayed an aptitude for dramatic illustration that should have ensured for him, before the footlights, a reputation equal to that of the late Sir Henry Irving, had he followed the profession, instead, of the less exciting occupation of carter) was answering with considerable verve the queries addressed to him. At last the climax came. The constable inquired the manner of the blows and the force with which they were delivered. The defendant is tall and long of leg and arm. He answered patiently, but apparently at length came to the conclusion that words alone were not sufficient to convince a constable. Suddenly and with one huge stride be advanced towards the official with the words “I will show you how I did it; now suppose you were the horse,” and before the constable had time to even imagine such a position as hia descent from official dignity to that of a puller of a dray, the de» fendant’s length of arm had enabled him to nearly grasp the tar of his interrogator in the manner in which it was alleged that he had seized the ear of the horse. With a smart official movement in a backward direction and a dignified protest, Constable Fitzpatrick withdrew himself from a position, that to one of less experience, might have resulted in considerable embarrassment. The taps from the hand on the neck of the horse did not receive their .apparently Intended illustration, on the nock of the constable. But the scene was one so ludicrous that the crowded Court was. for the moment, convulsed with laughter. The pen of Charles Dickens alone could worthily have depicted the extreme humour of the situation.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RAMA19100225.2.47

Bibliographic details

Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXIV, Issue 9690, 25 February 1910, Page 5

Word Count
406

AN AMUSING INCIDENT. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXIV, Issue 9690, 25 February 1910, Page 5

AN AMUSING INCIDENT. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXIV, Issue 9690, 25 February 1910, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert