Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COURT WANTED BACK

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES REPLY TO DEPUTATION The Prime Minister, Mr G. W. Forbes, speaking plainly, told a Labor deputation at Dunedin which asked for the restoration of the Arbitration Court that it had been a case of two armed camps. Employers were looked upon as common enemies, to which Mr Robinson, a member of the deputation, replied that that had not been the case in Dunedin.

Mr Forbes then raised the question of the inability of an industry to pay. At a meeting of trade representatives in Wellington one man said that if an industry could not pay a decent wage it. should not be in existence. Mr Robinson: That is what Sir Robert Stout said.

Mr Forbes: He is not here' now, and changed conditions often change opinions.

Tt was better when an industry was struggling that .a man should tie employed at a lower wage instead of joining the unemployed. Another member of the deputation: If the position were planed before the Arbitration Court it, would be taken into consideration. ‘Mr Forbes said that in a great many eases there was quite a friendly atmosphere in business, and lie had never found a decent employer who •was not prepared if he were in a position to pay a fair wage. Mr Batchelor: You have, never sat on a conciliation Council. The employers are dominated by Mr T. O. Bishop. He is the king-pin. Mr Fokbcs: You must admit that some of the workers are very difficult to agree with. All the fault is not on the employers’ side. You say that employers dictate. I say that, bad 'Labor representatives dictate. •Mr Robinson: That is why we want the .Court. “We do not stand for sweating,” declared Mr Forbes. “I nvas assured 'at the time by employers that if any alteration was given them to tide them over the difficult, times no advantage would be taken of it whatever. It you can give me evidence of sweating, chapter and verse, we will have it inquired into. After all, general statements can be refuted by statements in other directions.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19341220.2.8

Bibliographic details

Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 18585, 20 December 1934, Page 2

Word Count
351

COURT WANTED BACK Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 18585, 20 December 1934, Page 2

COURT WANTED BACK Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 18585, 20 December 1934, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert