Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE RUSSIAN TREATY

ADVANTAGES TO BRITAIN DEBATE IN THE COMMONS SOVIET’S PAIR ATTITUDE (British Official Wireless.) Roc. noon. RUGBY, March 1. In opening the House of Commons debate on the Anglo-Russian temporal')' trade agreement, Air Walter Runciman recalled that in the three years from 1929 to 1933 inclusive, the total value of Russian goods and materials sold in Britain was approximately £124,000,000, whereas goods from Britain sold in Russia came to about £40,000,000. One of the first objects of the British Government was to bring those two figures much nearer together. The Russians had now accepted'the view that Britain could not continue buying largely from them while they bought so little from Britain. He thought that was a very handsome admission on their part, but it was one that was absolutely necessary as the foundation of negotiations during the last 12 months. .- - -

The Russians had acknowledged Britain’s right to prohibit their goods if they were likely to frustrate the Imperial preferences provided for, in the Ottawa agreement. ‘ ‘ There again, ’ ’ said Air Runciman, “we must express satisfaction that they had been ready to accept our view.” The agreement provided that subjects of either country should enjoy in the other country all the trading facilities, rights, and privileges accorded to the subjects of any other country. The goods of either country should also enjoy in the country of either the facilities, rights, and privileges granted to any other foreign country in all that related to import' prohibition, restriction, and customs duties. The procedure laid down in regard to preferences was that if either party represented to the other that preferences were being frustrated, or home production detrimentally affected as .a result of prices created or maintained by such action, there were to be negotiations.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19340302.2.61

Bibliographic details

Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 18336, 2 March 1934, Page 7

Word Count
292

THE RUSSIAN TREATY Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 18336, 2 March 1934, Page 7

THE RUSSIAN TREATY Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 18336, 2 March 1934, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert