Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE.

DEBATE IN HOUSE OF COMMONS.

(Press Assn.— By Telegraph— Copyright.) v LONDON, May 7. The House of Commons was crowded for the debate on the Women's Suffrage Bill. The debate was characterised by conflicts between party friends on both aides. Mr Asquith, the Premier, declared that the social structure would not be strengthened by granting . the women votes. , He regretted the difference with his colleagues.' If they had hinted at a change of leadership he was prepared to resign, but the hint had not been given. Sir Edward Grey (Foreign Minister) emphasised Mr Asquith's fairness to his colleagues, who favored the Suffragette Bill, and were supporters of women's suffrage. There was reason to deplore what he considered the criminal conduct of a militant few. • Sir Edward Grey, Mr Lloyd George (Chancellor), Mr Birrell (Secretary for Ireland), Mr Buxton (President . of the Board of Trade), Mr Runciman (President Board of Agriculture) and Mr Acland (Under-Secretary for Foreign Affairs) voted for the Bill and Mr McKenna^(Home Secretary), Mr Hai^court (Colonial Secretary) and Colonel Seely (Minister for War) against it. A majority of the Nationalists opposed the Bill, which was rejected. There were a number of abstentions on both sides, and 22 pairs. OTTAWA, May 7. The annual conference of the National Council of Women at Montreal decided to support women's suffrage. A feature of the gathering was an address by Mrs Leathea, of Toronto, dealing with reforms effected m New Zealand by means of the women's vote. (Received May 8, 9.20 a.m.) LONDON, May 7. The fact that the women's suffragette movement is m a worse position than it was a year ago is ascribed by tnenewspapers as largely due to militancy.. The Westminster Gazette states that Parliament felt that if it passed Mr Dickinson's Bill it would be acting m the teeth of public opinion. Yesterday's majority against the Bill included many members who favor a small number of women voters, but not six millions forthwith.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19130508.2.42

Bibliographic details

Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XXXX, Issue 13069, 8 May 1913, Page 3

Word Count
327

WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE. Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XXXX, Issue 13069, 8 May 1913, Page 3

WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE. Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XXXX, Issue 13069, 8 May 1913, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert