Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

AN unreasonable: rule. AUCKLAND, July 5. Mr E. C. Cutten, S.M., has given judgment in the case of the New Zealand Plumbers and Gasfitters’ Association versus the Wellington Plumbers and Gasfitters’ Union for £8 3s, fees alleged to be due. The defendant- union purported to have resigned from the plaintiff association, but the plaintiff contended that this resignation did not. comply with the rules. Defendants urged that the rule was unreasonable and unworkable, and therefore invalid, as it- required that- the union desiring to resign must submit the signatures of all its officers. The Magistrate said the rule was quite unreasonable, though there could be no objection to the demand for reasonable notice. He thought a member of the association was entitled to protection against a rule that was quite unreasonable unless in quite exceptional circumstances. Judgment was given for defendant, with costs.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OW19210712.2.96

Bibliographic details

Otago Witness, Issue 3513, 12 July 1921, Page 24

Word Count
143

Untitled Otago Witness, Issue 3513, 12 July 1921, Page 24

Untitled Otago Witness, Issue 3513, 12 July 1921, Page 24

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert