Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DIVORCE CASE

INDIAN PRINCE IMMUNE. LONDON, December 21. In the divorce case Statham v. Statham the name of the Gaekwar of Baroda (a State of British India, in Gujerat) was mentioned, and the court reserved its decision on the point as to whether the Gaekwar, being a foreign ruling prince, was not immune from proceedings. court has now decided that the is an independent prince and outside its jurisdiction,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OW19111227.2.90

Bibliographic details

Otago Witness, Issue 3015, 27 December 1911, Page 24

Word Count
69

DIVORCE CASE Otago Witness, Issue 3015, 27 December 1911, Page 24

DIVORCE CASE Otago Witness, Issue 3015, 27 December 1911, Page 24

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert