Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HAWKE'S BAY.

Mr Turnbull, S.M., Napier, gave judgment for the defendant, with, costs, in the case of Ruscce v. Holt, in which plaintiff sought to recover moneys deducted from his wages for accident insurance during the last six years, 'lac decision was based on the ground that plaintiff raised no objection until he left Holt's employ, &o tacitly consenting, and that the Wages Protection Act was not retrospective, and did not f.pply to moneys paid before it came into force, such payments being until then expressly exempted from the operations of the Truck Act.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OW19000905.2.48.2

Bibliographic details

Otago Witness, Issue 2425, 5 September 1900, Page 17

Word Count
94

HAWKE'S BAY. Otago Witness, Issue 2425, 5 September 1900, Page 17

HAWKE'S BAY. Otago Witness, Issue 2425, 5 September 1900, Page 17

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert