SINGULAR DECISIONS. TO THE EDITOR.
Sm— ln your last issue appears a letter under the above beading, and mm your permission I will add to the number. A few weeks since a man byname Jackson was proceeded against by the police for wounding a horse, the property of a Chinaman. The wound was alight and injured the horse but slightly, and the only evidence against the accused was given by the Chinaman, who swore that he saw the accused throw a tomahawk at the accosed and so inflicted the wound. This witness was from half tothree-qnarters of a mile from the accused and the horse at the time. Certainly "his eyesight must be extra good to distinguish at such a distance. The Resident Magistrate committed the accused to take' hie trial at Duuedin. The jury, without much deliberation, acquitted the accused, who is a poor man with a urge family, and for so j trivial a case I can call it nothing but a singular decision.- Two other cue scaxne before the 'same Eeodent Magistrate lately— Strode and Fraser v. Napier— for stealing sheepskins. The ' first j case was for three' sheepskin* found on hiapre- j irises; the second case for three' 'sheepskinis found at. Williams and Brown's fellmongery establishment, -and* purchased from accused. After several adjournments the Resident llftgistrate gars the 'accused 14 days' -imprisonment in -Clyde Gaol on' the second case,',' and dismissed the first one.' ' Now I think this a -most angular decision. - If acsused was guHtyVsurefy the second case, where the <'sheepsktnV we're found on his premise*,'' was' the eaaiest p^oted!* and the most direct, and did not require the. evidence of the fellmongera. Bnt singular' things are often happening, and, as '"Goals." * says, are seldom known outside our 'dwWTittJe coterie. I think it would'be a wise as well as a safe plan for the Legislature, to remove 'our Wardeas -and Resident 'Magistrates a little oftener than they do. There is one thing certain :' the general public wouldnot suffer thereby although individuals may,— Tours, &c,
Joshce.
Vincent County, October 29th.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OW18771117.2.60
Bibliographic details
Otago Witness, Issue 1355, 17 November 1877, Page 16
Word Count
344SINGULAR DECISIONS. TO THE EDITOR. Otago Witness, Issue 1355, 17 November 1877, Page 16
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.