UNION’S CASE
Technical Workers In Hospitals A “ MISCONCEPTION ” PA WELLINGTON, May 31. “We are merely trying to clear up the position of those men who have always been members of our union and provided for by previous awards. We do not seek to gain one new member as a result of the new rules,’ said the secretary of the Wellington District Hotel. Hospital and Restaurant Workers’ Union, Francis O’Sullivan, in the Supreme Court today. “The word, * technician,’ was not our choice,” said witness. “It was coined by an Auckland medical superintendent in the course of conciliation proceedings and applied to a theatre attendant whom the doctor thought was a very good man—in fact, a technician.” O’Sullivan was giving evidence in an action by the Attorney-general and the Hospital Boards’ Industrial Union of Employers to seek to restrain the Hotel and Restaurant Workers’ Unions from including the word “ hospital ’ in their titles, and from including technicians in radiology, bacteriology, physio-therapy, laboratory and other skilled departments in award proceedings. After hearing evidence, Mr Justice Hutchison reserved his decision. Mr A. J. Mazengarb, opening the case for the defendant unions, said that although the onus did not lie on the unions, evidence would be called to show that hospitals and hotels and restaurants were related industries. The Wellington Hospital Board and all others made a charge for the maintenance of a patient, although none for medical and nursing attention, and in this respect hospitals were definitely related to the other trades, counsel said.
“These proceedings have been misconceived,” said Mr Mazengarb. “ There is no relation between eligibility for membership of a union and compulsory membership. It is a matter of common knowledge that Winston Churchill is a member of the Bricklayers’ Union, that the late J. H. Thomas was a member of the Engine Drivers’ Union, and that a reverend gentleman, formerly a director of broadcasting in New Zealand, was a member of the Waterside Workers’ Union. It cannot be suggested in any of these cases that the union has power to rule or govern outside of its trade. Once a person is eligible for membership he can become a member, but not until he is engaged in the trade are his terms of employment subject to an award, or is he required to join a union. “ There is no evidence before the court that male nurses as a class object to inclusion in the union. There is, in fact, ample machinery available for male nurses to form a union of their own if they are dissatisfied with the treatment they are getting from their union now.”
Evidence was also given by Frederick George Young, secretary of the Auckland branch of the Hotel and Restaurant Workers’ Union and of the New Zealand Federation.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19500601.2.131
Bibliographic details
Otago Daily Times, Issue 27404, 1 June 1950, Page 8
Word Count
460UNION’S CASE Otago Daily Times, Issue 27404, 1 June 1950, Page 8
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Otago Daily Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.