Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PETITION IN BALCLUTHA

Sir. —At its last meeting the Balclutha Borough Council received a petition signed by 39 residents and a letter from the Otago Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals asking that the water trough's in the main street might be spared for the sake of the driven animals that came into the borough on sale days, and also the dogs used to drive the same. The names attached to the pettion were obtained over a very small section of the borough, and the number could have been increased to hundreds if a wider canvass had been instituted. The astonishing thing about the matter is that the Mayor. Mr Ivan Jenkins, opened the discussion at the council table by remarking that “ only about six of all those (signatories) are really interested.” Obviously his meaning was that the big majority of the signatories were not engaged in driving stock or interested in their care on the main highway, and therefore they should have no sav in the matter. This is certainly a curious and very narrow view, and entirely misses the point, although that was emphasised in the society’s letter. The ordinary citizen is entitled In a democratic community to have his or her sav regarding injustice, whether it be in the form of cruelty to animals or cruelty to humans. That was the principle on which the SPCA was formed, and no other And a democratically-elected borough council should recognise it, and not seek to wield •• the big stick ” when in a position of temporary power. Fortunately, a majority of the council took a sympathetic and practical view of the position and decided that the water troughs be shifted to the street leading directly to the saleyards. They also rejected with unanimity a proposal of a decidedly reactionary nature in the form of a motion that in future the council should take no notice of petitions unless those who signed were really affected. This, of course, would rule out petitions altogether and deprive the burgesses of an inherent right recognised in all true democracies. —I am. etc:, Balclutha. Animal Lover.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19491108.2.115.5

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 27232, 8 November 1949, Page 8

Word Count
353

PETITION IN BALCLUTHA Otago Daily Times, Issue 27232, 8 November 1949, Page 8

PETITION IN BALCLUTHA Otago Daily Times, Issue 27232, 8 November 1949, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert