Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HAY DIET

FACT AND FANCY RHYTHM OF DIGESTIVE TRACT (From Our Own Correspondent) (By Air Mail) LONDON. Jan. 13. The medical editor of New Health has penned an article called “Hay Diet Fallacies.” It can be read in the January issue. From this article appended are extracts;— “Dr Hay’s system is based on the assumption that the human digestive arrangements are unsuited to deal with those combinations of foodstuffs to which mankind has turned for centuries past in order to provide it with an interesting meal. We are now told that to take our proteins and carbohydrates together at the same meal is an insult to our digestions, and that therefore we should forgo such wellestablished combinations as bread and cheese, bread or potatoes and meat, bread and butter and the breakfast egg, the innocent, seeming milk pudding after the meat, or the convenient picnic ham sandwich. “ So revolutionary a theory is difficult of acceptance in the light of practical . experience. If it were true we should all be dyspeptics. On the other hand, physiologists have been led to believe that the order and rhythms of the secretory and motor mechanisms of the digestive tract are so arranged that the various constituents of the meal are dealt with item by item independently of the presence of other constituents of the meal. Thus it is the acid chyme (partially digested stomach contents) which, as they leave 'the stomach, stimulates the secretion of the juices in the next part of the tract where carbohydrates are dealt with. Dr Hay would have it that the acidity of the stomach contents set up in taking meat inhibits the digestion of starch, the principal digestion of which takes place in the small gut. It is difficult to accept his theory on physiological grounds. WHERE IT MAY BE HELPFUL “ The proof of the puddinv—or, rather, in this instance, of no pudding —is in the results, say his disciples. Now, on general grounds, the diet recommended by Dr Hay is a very sound one, and no doubt it effects a very salutary influence on those who have habitually consumed too much carbohydrate, too little green stuff and fruit, and w'ho have eaten to excess when highly palatable mixtures of foodstuffs have so encouraged. Such people lose excessive weight on the diet, their digestions improve, and they feel, as they rejoice to tell the unbeliever. ‘marvellous.’ It would seem that the cult is far more popular among the female population and in those circles where the good things of the table are more accessible. “ Probably the best that can be fairly said for this system is that no harm can come to anyone who cares to take the trouble —and it certainly does involve a good deal of picking and choosing—to follow Dr Hay’s precepts, and it may be found helpful in certain cases.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19370205.2.114

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 23107, 5 February 1937, Page 11

Word Count
476

HAY DIET Otago Daily Times, Issue 23107, 5 February 1937, Page 11

HAY DIET Otago Daily Times, Issue 23107, 5 February 1937, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert