Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Tuesday, August 19. (Before Mr J. R. Bartholomew, S.M.) Judgment was given for tho plaintiffs by default in the following cases;—William Quirk v. A. W. Stanley (Wellington), claim £l4 13s lOd, for beard and lodging, with costs (£2 15s); Now Zealand Hardware Company v. W. Shaw, claim £5 13s, for goods supplied, with costs (£1 8s 6d); L. J. Potter v. Thomas Tree (Tahakopa), claim £1 2s, balance due for professional services, with costs (£1 ss); Herbert H. Croft v. H. B Scott, claim £4 14s sd, on account staled, with costs (£l 3s 6d). Claim for Possession.—William Edward Toaae proceeded against Mary Dooherty on a claim for possession of a house situated at 56 Albany street.—An order was_ made in favour of the plaintiff for possession on or before September 16, with costs (£1 6s). —Mr Baylee appeared for tho plaintiff.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19240820.2.8

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 19255, 20 August 1924, Page 3

Word Count
144

MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 19255, 20 August 1924, Page 3

MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 19255, 20 August 1924, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert