MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Otago Daily Times, Issue 13941, 28 June 1907, Page 7

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Thursday, June 2". {Boforc Mr H. Y. Widdowson, S.M.) Judgment was given for plaintiffs, by den!\\ following eases:—Loohhead IJjW.) v. Mioltoel Majniix, oloim for Sr'., ocllhea <l (LW.) v. David Gillespie (\\ nikaia), claim £1 '2s, balance duo soid arid delivered (costs rn 8 .l ; L^ hl ; ead (Ltd.) V. Robert Richard J flit (Ryal Bush, Southland), c>laiin 13b 9cl, balance duo on goods sold aud delivered (costs IBs), Loohhoad (Ltd.) v. Jtobert Jlcldium OVaihoaka), claim £1 10s, balance duo on goods sold and delivered (costs 19s), Lochhead (Ltd.) v. James Nisbsi (Dip-ton) claim £3 16s, balance duo on goods sold and delivered (costs £1 ss); Lochhead (ud.) V. Mtrtin , Campbell (Noilh Invercargill), claim XI 103, Ijalance duo on goods sold and delivered (corfs 8s), Lochhead (Ltd.) v. jwbert Hughes (Riverton Ktiik), claim il Gs b.ilawe due on goods told and delivered (costs 8s), D.I.C. v. David' Hood,-claim i' 3 J" M, goods sold and delivered (costs ss)- ;!■- a ', ld (Ltd ') v ' p - B - Ko bin son Umwald), claim £11 9s Gd, amount of dishonoured promissory note and interest (costs i'l 10s 0d); Louis Faig-an v. Robert M'Lcod, claim £5 14s 3d, gcods supplied (costs £1 3s /r! (Ltd.) v. Michacl Ha-mian (Orepuki), claim £3 15s, balanco due on goods Mid r.nd delivered (costs lis); Loclilwad i ; i V \ Al ' exar - <lcr Stevens (Ryal Bush, feonthland), claim £2 Hs 6d, hire of ft'eotvin- m?chinc (costs ill 9s); Lochhead (Ltd.) v, J' 111 Dytr (East Invercargill), claim £i Go. hire of a sewing machine (costs 8s); L&chliead (Lkl.) v. Charles Hansen (Inver-ca-rgill), ckim £1 10s f hire of sfwinoluschino (co?ts 8s), Sleight, Frier, and Co! v. Iwnicfit R. I3cddy (fiorc), claim £18 9s od, goods ?old and and raonevs received for plaintifT.V use (ccets £1 10* Gd); »T. h. Butler (Ltd.) v. ; Thomas Ekenrfedn (liiycrcargill), c |«m JC2 Bs, goofe sold and delivered (costs 10s), Brace, Windle. Blytlv, olid Co. v. M. O'Donohue (Xascby), claim XG li. ba'auce due on gc-ods supplied (costs .61 os 0;l), Lschhwd (Ltd.) v. Isadc M'Qucen (»nllacetown), claim.for costs (17s); Lochliead (Ltd.) v. AVillism Bariiett .(Bailout), c.ftilu £8 10s, bula-icL l due oil gcods supplied £l 12s M); Lxhhcad (Ltd.) v. William JlMas.or (Invcrcargill), clr-iui fl, balance due on goods supplied (costs ss), Bini? llarns, and- Co. v. Ernest 11 Eoddy (Gere), claim £37 18s 3d, goods sold and delivered (costs £2 14s); I?. Hudson and Co, v. A. Cliisholm (Pleasant Point), clnim £13 19s lOd pocds supplied (costs £1 10s fid); Lochhead (Ltd.) v. Biiznbeth Haines (Invcroatgill), c.aim 17s Gd, amount du® lor hire of sewine muchino (costs ss); New Zealand Exwcss Company v. Charles B. Elms (Temuka), 18s Bd, Eervices rendered (costs £1 10a

Lochhrad (Lid.) v. Elizabeth licdfrcra.— Clium fa 69, for tewing msoliino sold M <l delivered.—ln (his cusp application waa nwdo on J hlirfd.iv last by dafondwit, fcr whom Mr Scurr appeared, fcr n chanjo of venue (o IwilWfl, but tho application wns refused. »lion tlio esse was called on yesterday momV.'H' . P nrnaT( l. who appeared for the plaintin?, intimated his intention of discontinuing tho present action, and ot instituting fresh proceedings n t a later date.—Mr Scurr thereupon applied fee co^ts.—Mr Biihiard m»<-V application for costs on tho change of venue. —" no Magistrate declined to grant costs on the plaintiffs' application, and niado an order for the payment of £1 Is costs to dofendant. Ojago Seine Fishermen's Industrial Union 5f » erfcers v. Herbert Aohor, fisherman, Port. Chalmers. Claim £2 Is. for subscriptions alleged to ho overdue to the said union at tho rate of Is per month.—Mr Burnard apneared for ilia plaintiff union, and Mr A. S. Adanw for defendant.—Mr Burna-rd raid defendant was !■. member of tho Otago Seine Fishermen's Industrial Union of Workers, and was „in arrears vrlt-}i his subscriptions to the extent of £2 Is. beirg 41 months' subscriptions is per month.—James Kuilor Hold&n said iif™ 9 '' ltf tho union referre<l to. —Mr Adams asked witness to produce a sea,'ed copy of the rules of the union.—Witness replied that he had neglected to bring t'b-eni to eonrt-.—Mir Adams submittal that plaintiff mu4 1» lioOTiited.— Mr Burnard said lie cculd not proceed with the case under ths circumstances. am' would have to ?übnii4 to a nonsuit —Nonsuited accordingly, with costs (£1 la).—Two other rases, both claims against members of ihe same union for alleged everduo subscriptions—in one oaso u:i amount of X't 17s, and in the other £1 19s—wero struck out