MAGISTRATES COURT.

Otago Daily Times, Issue 13582, 2 May 1906, Page 7

MAGISTRATES COURT.

Monday; Aran, 30. (Before Mr H. Y. Widdowson, S.M.) Judgment was given for the plaintiff in tho following undefended casc&-L. Motria and Co. (Mr Irwin) v. W. J. Sfonohouso (of Tim«ru), £1 h 9d. for goods supplied, and costs 32s Gd; Weekly Budget (Mr Stamper) y, Georgo Musson (o! Greymcrath), 15s for subscriptions, and coats ss; London Dental Institute (Sir Moore) v. 11. A. M'EwaH, £2, goods, and costs, 15s; Hnllonstein Bros., and Co. (Mr Moore), v. A. Webster (of limnra), IGa Gd good's, and costs ss; the same v. William Fitzgerald and Co (of Timarn), & 6s, goods, and costs 10s; 4he same v. M. O'Connor (of Timaru), 14s 4d, goods, and costs ss; Laidlaw. and dray (Ltd.) (Mr Moore) v. S. N. .Fenton (of Wetherstone*. near Lawrence), £1, goods, and costs ss; J. Smith (Mr Moore) v. A. Larson (of Alexandra), Gs 3d, goods, and costs ss; Commercial Agoncy Company (Mr Baron) v. John Seymour (oi Feilding), ss, goods supplied; Moritzson and Co. (Mr Hov) v. E. O'Donnell. £17 l(b. goodn supplied, and costs 23s 3d; Eliza Pye (Mr James) v. Jas. O'Connor. 3os, board and lodging, and costs 10s; Edward Soilness v. William Orr (of Cromwell), £G Gs, goods, and costs, 37s Gd; Fred. Smith, jun. (Mr Moore) v. ,T. C. M'Bride (of Qucenstown), £a ss, goods, and costs 83s Gd. ' New Zealand Paper Mills v. Christopher Smith (Kavenßbounic). Claim £6 15s Gd, on judgment summons.—Tho debtor was examined and the court declined to make any order. ''■'~ M'Neill and Williams v. James Peebles. Claim £26 12s. for work done. Mr Barclay for plaintiffs. Mr John Macgrcgor for the defendant, . Plaintiffs were', sub-contractora under defendant, and the dispute arose over certain detailed extrns in a Dunedin contract. Defendant paid £20 and costs (£3 is) 'into court—Judgement, for plaintiffs for amount paid into court. Defendant allowed costs 245, and solicitor's costs, 425.