Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HATUMA COMPENSATION CASE.

(Pee United Press Association.)

NAPIER, April 12.

The second hearing of the Hatuma compensation case came to an abrupt adjournment to-day. After the first hearing certain points raised by Mr Russell's counsel were embodied in the case cited for the Court of Appeal, and various questions were ansv/ered ; but during the proceedings today it transpired that counsel for the Crown and Mr Russell put widely different interpretations on these answers.- Mr Justice Edwards intimated that he agreed with the view of Dr Findlay, Crown counsel, but in such an important matter, he would prefer that the Appeal' Court should decide the meaning of its judgment. It was agreed to state a case to elucidate the points in dispute.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT18990413.2.60

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 11396, 13 April 1899, Page 5

Word Count
121

HATUMA COMPENSATION CASE. Otago Daily Times, Issue 11396, 13 April 1899, Page 5

HATUMA COMPENSATION CASE. Otago Daily Times, Issue 11396, 13 April 1899, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert