Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE MIDLAND RAILWAY LITIGATION.

WELLINGTON, December 12. The hearing of the Midland Kailway case was begun before the Chief Justice and Mr Justice Edwards UKliy- Sir B. Stout, Mr Theo. Cooper, and Dr Findlayappeared for the receiver (Mr Coates), Mr Quick for the debenture-holders, Messrs Bell and Gully for the Government. There are two motions before the court-one is for a summons directine the Crown to show cause why an absolute Kile of the railway should not take place, under which the receiver^ should, obtain possession of the railway and sell it if he thinks fit ■ ?he otheris a summons by the Crown to fie receiver to show cause why an order apfl o!ntogl him1 -should not ]* roscndeoVor varied, inasmuch as. that order directs^abso: lute sale of the railway, which, th Oj Crown alleges, the court had no power to order ■ S?rK Stout said the contention of the Crown Was that the debentureMders had no; security\t He submitted that the'LegiSlature never intended inich. Muraboa, Mr

Cooper' contended that •■ undor the act of 1884- paople who lent: the company moneyhad a first charge, over the company's proP' Mr '8011, for the Crown, admitted that, the debentures-holders had 'first, charge, but' argued' that it: was'subject to the right of the Crown to step in for breach of contract. ' .:.. ";,: ,'t" -.: ."■'.•■■■. "■ /December 13/ : Th? hearing of ihe Midland Eailway case was briefer than was expected. Mr Gully ' followed Mr Bell for the Crown, arguing ■ that • what ■ the < debenture-holders ■ wanted was to tget the'constructed portion of the line; which was of value, and be discharged from iill obligations binder the contract. Sir E. Stout replied. He.asked the court :in deciding the case; to settle the questions First,- whether., the debenture-holders were entitled to possession 'of the constructed part of. the railway; and secondly, whether they were;i entitled to ■■ have an ■ order for the sale of either two ; constructed portions "of the.line.: Judgment was reserved..

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT18981220.2.85

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 11301, 20 December 1898, Page 6

Word Count
319

THE MIDLAND RAILWAY LITIGATION. Otago Daily Times, Issue 11301, 20 December 1898, Page 6

THE MIDLAND RAILWAY LITIGATION. Otago Daily Times, Issue 11301, 20 December 1898, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert