WHOSE FAULT?
McDonald Unfairly Criticized 1 (From "N.Z. Truth's" Special Auckland ; . Rep.) [ It is just possible that Alan Mc- , Donald may be unfairly criticized m some quarters over his riding of Mister Gamp m the Great Northern Hurdles, but there are two sides to every story. THE, adverse criticism came about 1 over Alan allowing Mister Gamp [ to run up alongside Beau Cavalier - when nearing the seventh fence, thus 1 having to take off with such a great fencer as the winner. ' It is true that an indifferent jump . on the part of Mister Gamp at that ' stage commenced the undoing of the • Manawatu' gelding's prospects. It certainly seemed' that Sam Henderson, on Beau Cavalier, was "pitch- '■ ing" for something of the sort when he eased his horse up, g-oing- over the i rise past the stewards' stand for the final circuit. At that stage, Mister Gamp was lying second and pulling hard. : The argument m McDonald's favor ■ is that it was just as equally objec- . tionable to try harder at his. mount to keep him back as it was to make head- ■ way. , i i Mister Gamp was certainly doing his i work impressively up to his failure to clear the seventh fence as cleverly as Beau Cavalier, but the loss of a few lengths there — and still three hurdles to clear — did not allow for any further delay. ; . ■ -, It was a case of keeping Mister Gamp up to it, but he was not equal to the task of getting through without mishap. Had he stood up, it looked like a battle between himself and Beau Cavalier for the thick end of the purse, but opinions will always differ as to which of the pair would have won.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTR19280607.2.64
Bibliographic details
NZ Truth, Issue 1175, 7 June 1928, Page 12
Word Count
289WHOSE FAULT? NZ Truth, Issue 1175, 7 June 1928, Page 12
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.