Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ANOTHER ASPECT.

. However, ths . AuoHl&n.d "Star" got faußy and 'commented as follows :*■—

In view^ of ' Mr Mfissey supporting this -particular purchase, it is aa well that the facts should be fully stated rind the public itself Judg<s the nature pf the transaction.

The block is known as the Tatua West Park and consists of 1000 acres. It was offered by Mr Dansey, of Rotorua, to the Crown for £$000, and was declined by the local Commissioner of Crown Lands. A little later it" was sold to Mrs Hoyes for £4850 and the transfer will be. found registered- (vol. 48, folio. 222, Auckland Registry Office). , About 14 months later Mrs Hoyes sold it for £27,600 to the- Crown through the Railway Department. •;Mr Massey states that the Crown did not "acquire the freehold., but thip .he appears to be miainform"ed, for, according^ to vol. 2SI, folio. 18, 'm the Deeds Registry, ..-. Auckland, the . Crown , has a Land Transfer title m ,fee simple. • „-. ■ The Commissioner of Crown Lands would not- report m favor of the purchase for £8000, ljut m Wellington through the Railway Department the Crown gives £27,500. The block is shown on the Crown Lands Department map as 3000 feet above sea level. The timber is Inaccessible and experts can prove that it is extremely difficult to get it out. The Railway Department since the purchase of the block. have not tried to cut the .timber. At the same time the department ■ has ample timber m the Mamuku ranges linked up by tram lines to the mills and station 'at Mamuku. r - It la drawing attention to this Government transaction by a correspondent that the Prime Minister m a speech at Howick referred to as "despicable mudthrowing." As our contemporary says, the public should judge. Who Is right? Is it a mare's nest?

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTR19221209.2.8.2

Bibliographic details

NZ Truth, Issue 889, 9 December 1922, Page 2

Word Count
303

ANOTHER ASPECT. NZ Truth, Issue 889, 9 December 1922, Page 2

ANOTHER ASPECT. NZ Truth, Issue 889, 9 December 1922, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert