TE ARO RECLAMATION BILL.
TO THE EDITOR. Sir, — X see by your parliamentary report that during'the debate on the above subject, Mr. Bunny stated “ that no private interests were affected.” _ May I then, Sir, inquire what is to be done with the owners of property in Courtenay Place, whose boundary, according to their Crown grants, is Lambton Harbor. Provision should certainly be made in the Act to protect their right (if any) to the water frontage. Thanks are due to Mr. Vogel for his action in the matter. Caution is very necessary where large schemes are proposed by such enlightened bodies as our City Corporation.— I am, &c., Tjs Abo.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM18740801.2.15
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 4170, 1 August 1874, Page 2
Word Count
110TE ARO RECLAMATION BILL. New Zealand Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 4170, 1 August 1874, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in