Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE DOG, THE MAN, AND THE MEAT.

A friend of mine and I were walking together the other day ; a dog dashed past ns after something he saw on the pavementIt was a big piece of meat. He pounced on it and swallowed it in two seconds. My companion looked ■at the dog with envious admiration. "My humble friend," he said, " I'll give , >u .£SOOO for your appetite and your digestion. Jfou are not afraid to eat; I am." But the uog knew what happiness is made of. He declined the offer and trotted away. It is astonishing how many different people use this expression. "I am" or " I was " afraid to eat. As the writer pens these lines five letters lie on the table before him, every one of them containing itret the persons who wrote the letters are not known to one another. There was, therefore, no agreement among them. Why should there be, even if they were acquainted ? No, there is nothing in it to wonder at. They went through the same experience, and express it in the most natural way, that's all.

But what does it mean ? Are people suspicious of poisoned food ? No, no; that is not so. The food is not poisoned before it is eaten, but afterwards. Art example will show what really occurs, and why so many are afraid to eat. We quote from one of the letters : "One night, early in 1892," says the writer, " I was seized with dreadful pains in the pit of the stomach, and a choking sensation in the throat. I feared I was going to die. My wife called in a neighbour. They applied hot flannels and turpentine, but I got no relief. Then a doctor came and gave me medicine. He said he never saw anyone's tongue in such a condition. It was of a yellow colour, and covered with a slimy phlegm, so thick I could have scraped it with a knife. I had a foul, bitter taste in my mouth, and my eyes were so dull I could scarcely see. I had a heavy pain in the side, and felt so dejected and miserable I didn't know what to do with myself. What little food I took gave me so much pain I was afraid to eat. The doctor put me on starvation diet, and injected morphine to ease the pain. " Getting no real benefit from the first doctor I saw another, who said I had enlargement of the liver. He gave me medicines, but I got no better. In August I went to Exmouth to see what my native air would do for me, but came back worse than ever. I had lost over three stone in weight, and being too weak to move about I used to lie on the couch most of the time. I never expected to get well, and didn't care much what became of me.

•' One day in October raj wife said, 'lt appears the doctors ,caii do nothing for you, so law <join<j to doctor you myself.' She went to the Southern Drug Stores, in. Camberwell road, and got a bottle of Mother Seigel's Curative Syrup. After taking this medicine for a few days the pain in my stomach left me, my appetite improved, and I gained some strength. Soon afterwards I was back at my work.' The people in tho office, seeing how well I looked, asked what had cured me, and I answered Mother Seigel's Syrup. I shall be glad to reply to any enquiries about my case. (Signed) Charles Harris, 74, Beresford street, Camberwell, London, December Ist, 1892."

Mr Harris' statement goes straight to the point. Why was he afraid to eat ? Because his food gave him pain without giving him strength. This was dead wrong. It was exactly the reverse of what it should have been. When a man is> in proper form he gets vigour and power from his meals, and eats them with enjoymeDfc and relish. If he doesn't there is something the matter with him. What is it ? Now let your thoughts expand a bit, so as to take in a broad principle. One man's meat is another man's poison, they say. That's so, but 'tV oniy half the truth. Any man's meat is any man's poison, under certain conditions. If grain never got any further than the mill hopper we should never have bread, and if bread (or other food) never got further than the stomach we should never have strength. See ? Well, when the stomach is torpid, inflamed, and "on strike," what happens ? Why, your food lies in it and rots. The fermentation produces poisons which get into the blood and kicks up the worst sort of mischief all over the body. This is indigestion and dysepsia, though the doctors call each and every trick of it by a separate name. Yet they don't cure it, which is the main thing after all.

But Mother Seigel's Curative Syrup does, at> Mr Harris says, and as thousands of others say.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZMAIL18960130.2.35

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Mail, Issue 1248, 30 January 1896, Page 13

Word Count
842

THE DOG, THE MAN, AND THE MEAT. New Zealand Mail, Issue 1248, 30 January 1896, Page 13

THE DOG, THE MAN, AND THE MEAT. New Zealand Mail, Issue 1248, 30 January 1896, Page 13

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert