The case of Carpenter v. Bunny, which was fixed for argument at the Supreme Court on Saturday, lias been discontinued, the decision in McGregor and Newton v. Bunny being accepted as governing it. Each party pays his own costs. Carpenter v. Bunny was a case on appeal from the determination of the Stipendiary Magistrate upon a question arising under the Contractors’ rfrid Workmen’s Lien Act, 1892. The plaintiff was the sub-contractor for painting in the contract for the erection of defendant’s house at the Lower Hutt, and he gave defendant notice under the Act of a charge upon all moneys due to the contraptors. The Magistrate decided that the plaintiff was not within the time specified in the Act for taking proceedings, and against this decision the plaintiff appealed.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZMAIL18941221.2.48
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Mail, Issue 1190, 21 December 1894, Page 15
Word Count
129Untitled New Zealand Mail, Issue 1190, 21 December 1894, Page 15
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in