STOCKING RIVERS

New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXVII, Issue 23761, 14 September 1940, Page 13

STOCKING RIVERS

LIBERATION OF TROUT WISDOM QUESTIONED ■ • I ■ NATURAL LIMITATIONS i [bt telegraph—OWN correspondent] WELLINGTON. Friday The utility of liberating trout fry, as is widely practised by acclimatisation societies throughout New Zealand, to maintain the stocks of fish in the streams, is questioned bv Mr. Derisley F. Hobbs,- fresh-water biologist at the Fisheries Laboratory, Wellington, in a bulletin issued by the Fisheries Branch ' of the Marine Department. The bulletin is a study of the natural reproduction of trout, and its relation to the density of trout populations, in New Zealand water. In it Mr. Hobbs says that trout populations are limited by natural causes and that it is vain to endeavour to increase them above those limits by liberations. As a result of extensive researches in streams of Otago and Auckland Provinces Mr. Hobbs ascertained that trout populations appeared to be generally limited by the extent of the spawning grounds available. Reproduction Facilities The natural reproduction of introduced rainbow and brown trout was found to be a highly efficient process under favourable conditions. Such conditions were usual in New Zealand trout streams. Where satisfactory facilities for natural reproduction existed "the development of stocks of trout had been correspondingly satisfactory. It appeared that, whether or not liberations continued to be made regularly, the introduction of trout was successful largely according to the extent that facilities for reprodugtion existed. Trout required very special conditions for spawning. They were very particular as to the size of stones, degree of consolidation and gradient _of their spawning-i-edds. The extent of suitable areas was therefore "very limited, even in streams with beds predominantly of gravel from the hills down to the sea. Rather than spawn in unsatisfactory materials, late spawners would occupy sites used by previous comers, and this superimposition caused fairly extensive losses of eggs through displacement and damage. New Zealand stocks had developed to the poin^ 5, where this condition occurred m a considerable proportion of spawning grounds. No Advantage Gained When the stock of trout in a stream was reduced to the level where its natural reproduction was most efficient it was capable ef producing more mature fish than were necessary., to . maintain the stock at that level—thereby providing scope for exploitation in the way of angling. To keep the stock, below this level and make regular liberations, was uneconomic,~as it necessitated expenditure of money to effect what the stock itself would do if intelligently exploited. If the stock was maintained at that level, on the other hand, no advantage accrued from liberation of fish to provide more than would be taken by angling. Liberations of fish even just sufficient to balance the numbers extracted by anglers might not serve a useful purpose if they safeguarded from exploitation the quantitv of fish which was produced naturally. "The wisdom may well be doubted of attempting artificially to aid the natural increase of populations (be they of deer, oysters or trout) by re- ~ leases into areas where a natural ability to increase is already being frustrated by environmental limitation," Mr. I Hobbs- concludes.