OBJECTION TO EVIDENCE
APPEAL AGAINST RULING COURT RESERVES DECISION [BY TELEGRAPH —PRESS ASSOCIATION] WELLINGTON, Wednesday The Appeal Court to-day heard the case of Walter Robert Boyd, of Putaruru, who in August was found] guilty by a jury at Hamilton of receiving a number of truck tyres, valued at £l2l Bs. During the hearing of the case the Crown desired to call evidence to show that certain , cigarette tobacco obtained by theft had been found in accused's possession, but to this accused's counsel raised an objection. The Judge, however, ruled that the evidence was admissible, but deferred sentence pending the determination by the Court of Appeal of the case stated for its opinion by Mr. Justice Fair on this point. Decision was reserved.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19361001.2.157
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXIII, Issue 22538, 1 October 1936, Page 15
Word Count
122OBJECTION TO EVIDENCE New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXIII, Issue 22538, 1 October 1936, Page 15
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.
Log in