Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FORESTERS' LITIGATION.

DISPUTE REGARDING HALL:

A "CHANGE IN TFMPER."

Trie dispute in regard to the ownership of the Foresters' Hall, at Takapuna, which has arisen between the local court (Mr. Gould), and the district executive of the Order (Mr. Hogben), was again before Mr. Justice Herdman at the Supreme Court yesterday.

Mr. Gould asked that an injunction should be granted against the district'executive. The parties up till Friday last, he said, had failed to agree. On Friday he learned that the district executive had suspended Court Takapuna and laid a series of charges for trial before the tribunal of the Order with a view to the expulsion of Court Takapuna from the hall. There was no authority in the rules of the Order for that course. He took that action as incompatible with farther negotiations, and cancelled all offers of settlement. He now asked intervention by the Supreme Court, although the keys of the hall were given up to the local court that morning. Mr. Hogben, who deprecated the jrranting of en injunction, said that the temper of the district executive had changed. On Friday last they had the full facts before them with legal advice on these facts and considered the whole matter judicially. The result was that thej decided to hand over to Court Takapuna Lodge the keys of the building, and that had since been done. He had had to advise the district executive that the charges mado with a view to the suspension or expulsion of the court were ultra vires, and these charge* had been abandoned. The granting of an injunction might aggravate the position, as there was no reason for apprehending further interference.

The Judge Baid that in view of Mr. Hogben's representation it would be inadvisable to grant an injunction at this stage and he would adjourn the application. In the event of any further interference, pending the settlement of the question of title, the local court could again ask for protection.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19220315.2.11

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LIX, Issue 18040, 15 March 1922, Page 5

Word Count
329

FORESTERS' LITIGATION. New Zealand Herald, Volume LIX, Issue 18040, 15 March 1922, Page 5

FORESTERS' LITIGATION. New Zealand Herald, Volume LIX, Issue 18040, 15 March 1922, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert