Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RULES OF A UNION.

CONFLICT WITH AWARD.

DEFENDANT WINS HIS CASE.

An important legal objection, which was subsequently upheld by Mr. C. C. Kettle, S.M., was raised by Mr. Brown in a case at. the Magistrate's Court yesterday, when the Labour Department sued G. R. Hosking for a penalty of £10 for failing to notify the secretary of the Carpenters' Union, in accordance with clause 12 of the award, that he had engaged two carpenters, who were non-unionists.

Mr. Brown appeared for the defendant and pointed out that the award provided that any journeyman carpenter of good character and sober habits shall be admitted to membership upon payment of the entrance fee. The provision regarding notification to the secretary, however, shall only operate so long as the rules of the union shall permit this. The union rules stated that candidates shall have been working in the carpentry and joinery trade for five years and must be " competent workmen ' of steady habits and good moral character. The union rules, therefore, precluded anyone from joining the union who was not a competent workman, and clause 12 compelling notification to the secretary that non-unionists had been engaged was inoperative, as it only applied to comj petent workmen.

The inspector of awards said that mem bers were admitted without selection and ballot, and, therefore, there was no discrimination.

The Magistrate: Who admits them? The Inspector : The secretary. The Magistrate : If he had reason to believe a workman was Tint competent he would not admit the applicant? The Inspector : The award provides that a. journeyman is one who has served five years. The Magistrate : The man must, be competent. That is the restriction' The Inspector : If the word competent ■was left out the union -would have to accept anyone. The Magistrate : Candidates must be competent workmen. After further argument, the magistrate said that in his opinion clause 12 was inoperative. Every person who joined the union, under the miss, had to be competent, and this prevented the clause of the award under which defendant was Isued from being enforced. The rules should state that every journeyman car penter and joiner of good character and "Slob habits shall be entitled to become a member of the union. Judgment would be for defendant.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19150219.2.78

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LII, Issue 15848, 19 February 1915, Page 7

Word Count
376

RULES OF A UNION. New Zealand Herald, Volume LII, Issue 15848, 19 February 1915, Page 7

RULES OF A UNION. New Zealand Herald, Volume LII, Issue 15848, 19 February 1915, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert