Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COMPENSATION CASE.

[bt telegraph.— association.]

Dunedin, Friday. The Arbitration Court gave judgment today in tho compensation case, Bland v. Davis. Tho claimant had his leg injured by a fall from a scaffold, and it had to be amputated above the ankle. Claimant was leading man .at the building of a cottage, having with him Davis' two sons and an apprentice, and the scaffold was put up by himself and Davis' son. The Court said the evidence displayed carelessness, very great carelessness, on the part of; olaimani _In the Court's opinion he did not bring himself within the exemption of seotion 5. The Court, therefor©, made a declaration and fixed the amount to bo paid during total incapacity at £1 9s 4d per week,, with costs.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19050729.2.8

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XLII, Issue 12931, 29 July 1905, Page 3

Word Count
125

COMPENSATION CASE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLII, Issue 12931, 29 July 1905, Page 3

COMPENSATION CASE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLII, Issue 12931, 29 July 1905, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert