Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ARBITRATION COURT.

[by telegraph.—press ASSOCIATION*.] Dunedin, Tuesday. . At the Arbitration Court, Sir. Justice Chapman, speaking in reference to the Christchureh telegram regarding the case of the Tinsmith Workers v Crompton, said the message was somewhat misleading. As a matter of fact, there was no award or case, only an industrial agreement. It was dismissed, because the men not being parties to it were not bound by it. Had there been an award they would have been bound. During the present visit of the Court it has • heard four industrial disputes, twelve compensation claims, and 67 applications for enforcement of awards. Although the business is not completed, the members leave for Timaru and Christchurch to-, morrow, cases having been fixed there previously.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19040914.2.44

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XLI, Issue 12660, 14 September 1904, Page 5

Word Count
121

ARBITRATION COURT. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLI, Issue 12660, 14 September 1904, Page 5

ARBITRATION COURT. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLI, Issue 12660, 14 September 1904, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert